Tag Archives: Sonia Delaunay

Normalized

I’m aware of how hokey the previous post became toward the end—the list of artist destroyers is pop art history, and not very good pop art history at that. However, those pairs—Malevich/Mondrian, Pollock/Rothko and Stella/Richter—are in an important sense my … Continue reading

Posted in Abstraction and Society, Current Affairs, Early Abstraction, Ethics of Abstraction | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Over the Circle

Readers familiar with my blog are probably wondering why I haven’t started in again on Frank Stella. Just waiting. Have many thoughts, and following on the theme of recent posts about Kandinsky there is an opportunity to say something. Stella … Continue reading

Posted in American Modernism, Early Abstraction, Principles of Abstraction | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

A Journey by Train

Sonia Delaunay’s collaboration with Blaise Cendrars, La Prose du Transsiberien, featured in a number of recent catalogs, including Inventing Abstraction, is pretty interesting. I love the shapes, and of course I love the idea of an abstract book. This one is … Continue reading

Posted in Early Abstraction, Principles of Abstraction, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Arbitrary or Wilfull?

My personal definition of the arbitrary is a finite number of options, all equally good. That’s how a modern painting, or even a modernist painting, starts – with an arbitrary beginning. What does it matter after all whether the first … Continue reading

Posted in Early Abstraction, Principles of Abstraction, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Asymmetry

I found this quilt by Sonia Delaunay in the Sydney Paths to Abstraction catalog. I’ve been looking at it for a while, and just realized why I like it, and what it means for abstraction. The parts are not all … Continue reading

Posted in Early Abstraction, Principles of Abstraction, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment