Readers of the earlier post on captions and backstory might have had some difficulty in understanding the choice of illustration. Actually, it makes a lot of sense—what wouldn’t make sense is an explanation, even though this is not a story. Maybe it is a story. In any event, I’ll just say I was surprised to find out that Rauschenberg made more than one portrait of Iris Clert. And that he realized they were also portraits of himself.
-
Recent Posts
Currently Most Read Posts
Recent Comments
- Sharon McCarthy on Edges Early and Late
- Gregg Simpson on Empty Formalism of Education
- Martin Mugar on Those who make
- Martin Mugar on Unknown
- Peter peri on The Planar Dimension
Categories
- Abstraction and Society (196)
- American Modernism (168)
- Conceptualism and Painting (137)
- Current Affairs (84)
- Ethics of Abstraction (138)
- Italian Art (26)
- Latin American Abstraction (9)
- Principles of Abstraction (305)
- Uncategorized (277)
Tags
abstract art abstraction aesthetics autonomy backstory Boris Groys cubism Cézanne drawing emptiness feeling form Frank Stella Gego Gerhard Richter Greenberg grids illusion Jackson Pollock knowledge labor Linsley literature meaning nature Pablo Picasso painted reliefs place R.H.Quaytman Robert Motherwell science self-reflection series sex shaped canvas Shep Steiner Smithson society space subjectivity the inhuman time titles value Willem De Kooning-
Bookstore
-
Art and its Others (with Boris Groys)
Abstraction and Possibility Space (with Andreas Neufert)
Doors:River (with Joseph Drapell and David Moos)
Around the Episcene (with Scott Lyall)
Matrix of Surds (Mike Murphy and Wojciech Oleinik)
Non-Identical Abstraction Engine (with Jan Tumlir)
A CLOUDE OF UNKNOWYNG (Lee Henderson on Sasha Pierce)
Pictures and Picture Proofs (Wojciech Olejnik and James Brown)
On Parts You Can’t See (Polly Apfelbaum and Kelly Jazvac)
Links
Meta