Rothko’s Flaw

Rothko described Pollock as a “continuous and self sustaining advertising concern.” I think he was talking about himself, because his work depends so much on the caption he provided. The flaw in Rothko’s work is that it is two things, a painting and an attached meaning, namely his subjectivity, copy written as deep. Pollock’s silence has no bearing on the integrity of his work, but then Rothko is partly right: the integrity, wholeness and singularity of Pollock’s work is the best possible advertisement for itself.

This entry was posted in American Modernism, Ethics of Abstraction, Principles of Abstraction, Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>